Our leaders take us for a ride. They terrorize us, and seek to eliminate us or keep us under psychological shot? Arrestiamoli before it's too late!
Reuters news
LONDON (Reuters) - A terrorist attack in a Western country with the use of weapons of mass destruction is inevitable : he said in an interview published today by a British newspaper Henry Crumpton , Anti-terrorism coordinator at the U.S. State Department. [Bio - ndw]
> then it is inevitable if you go home and return the salary, no?
Speaking with Daily Telegraph, Crumpton said he feared that the threat of biological weapons is increasing.
"I consider the likelihood of terrorist groups using weapons of mass destruction very high," he told the newspaper the person responsible for the U.S.. "It 's just a matter of time."
> Let's soul in peace! Now we are doomed, there is no need to wait like ducks that Arabic ~ extermination us with a bad nuclear bomb or biological
"It's not just the nuclear threat that bothers me. I think, in the case, the biological threat is growing," said Crumpton, explaining that an attack with biological weapons would pose problems more than a ' explosion of radioactive material.
> We are spoiled for choice .. is not the spirit of globalization and free markets?
"As disasters can be a nuclear attack could be contained," said Crumpton. "But if you think the worst case scenario of a biological attack, it would be difficult to determine whether or not it is a terrorist attack, and it would be much more difficult to contain. "
> So I vote for a nuclear attack! Bin (if you're still alive, or rather, if you ever) Please! a nuclear bomb on Rome! If you have a heart, I beg you: Do not use biological weapons, then we do not know if it was you or our intelligence services paid .. .. oopps oopps deviant!
Crumpton said that after the war in Afghanistan, the U.S. has found evidence of a plot by al Qaeda to develop anthrax use against western countries, and added that the forces of the United States and its allies have thwarted the plans of al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden.
> very good at finding evidence, less good at finding people and weapons, Why? Perhaps because the "evidence" are easier to produce / invent / buy / manipulate?
"They can not communicate with their supporters ... can not get access to money and things like that. We have made life very difficult."
> Thank goodness! Before we say it is inevitable an attack in a large Western city and that terrorists may use a weapon of mass destruction, nuclear or biological choice and then say that you have made life difficult !
We want to prepare some "realistic simulation" as the attack on the subway in London? And the attack to the Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald in Chicago, it was later learned nothing?
